Pet ownership did not improve mental health symptoms during COVID-19 pandemic
- Recent studies have shown that pet ownership did not consistently improve mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic, contradicting popular assumptions.
- The impact of pet ownership on mental health was found to be context-dependent, with positive effects noted among specific groups like partnered individuals and dog owners, while some studies reported negative consequences such as lower resilience and higher loneliness among those with strong pet attachments.
- Sociodemographic factors and the additional challenges of pet care during the pandemic complicated the relationship between pet ownership and mental health, suggesting that the presence of pets may not universally provide emotional comfort and could even add to the stress experienced by owners.
Join Our Newsletter
Get the latest news, updates, and exclusive content delivered straight to your inbox.
Introduction
As the world grappled with the complexities of the COVID-19 pandemic, many people turned to a seemingly comforting companion: pets. The idea that owning a pet could alleviate mental health symptoms, such as depression and anxiety, has been a long-standing interest for researchers and the general public alike. However, recent studies have shed light on a different reality. Contrary to popular assumptions, pet ownership did not consistently improve mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. In fact, some findings suggest that pets might even have exacerbated mental health issues for certain individuals.
Early Expectations
For centuries, people have believed that the presence of animals in their lives has positive effects on their mental health. This notion gained popularity during the pandemic, with many viewing pets as a source of comfort and companionship in times of social isolation. The World Health Organization (WHO) echoed this sentiment, noting that spending time with pets could help alleviate anxiety and depression.
Initial studies exploring the impact of pet ownership during the pandemic were optimistic. Researchers discovered that pet owners reported better mental health and higher levels of happiness compared to non-pet owners. The assumption was that pets would provide emotional support and reduce feelings of loneliness, thereby mitigating the negative effects of social isolation.
Mixed Results
However, subsequent studies revealed a more nuanced picture. Investigations conducted in the United States and Canada demonstrated that while pet ownership did not universally improve mental health, it did have a positive impact on certain groups. For instance, a study conducted by Amiot and colleagues found that pet ownership was associated with better mental health outcomes among partnered individuals but not among unpartnered individuals. This suggests that the benefits of pet ownership were context-dependent and affected by factors like relationship status.
Another study by Ogata and colleagues analyzed the temporal patterns of pet ownership and mental health across different phases of the pandemic. They discovered that while pet owners experienced lower levels of stress and loneliness compared to non-pet owners, these effects were not uniform across all groups. Dog owners generally reported better mental health outcomes than cat owners, but this difference was largely mediated by the owner-pet relationship.
Contradictory Findings
Not all studies supported the idea that pet ownership improved mental health outcomes during the pandemic. A study published in PLOS ONE found that while pet ownership was associated with higher emotional wellbeing in the early stages of the pandemic, it was also linked to lower resilience and higher loneliness among individuals with high levels of pet attachment. This indicates that while pets might initially provide comfort, overly strong attachments could have negative consequences.
Similarly, a study conducted in Australia observed that pet ownership was not significantly associated with resilience, loneliness, or quality of life. Instead, it found that pet owners reported poorer quality of life during the lockdown period, suggesting that pets might actually add to the stress and burden experienced by their owners.
Sociodemographic Factors
The relationship between pet ownership and mental health was further complicated by sociodemographic factors. Researchers identified that certain groups, such as those with mental health conditions, might face additional challenges in managing pet ownership during the pandemic. The burden of caring for pets, including obtaining food and supplies and accessing veterinary care, could exacerbate their mental health symptoms.
Conclusion
The pandemic has underscored the complexities of pet ownership and its impact on mental health. While some studies suggest that pets can provide emotional comfort and reduce loneliness, others indicate that these benefits are not uniform and might be dependent on individual circumstances. The presence of pets may not universally improve mental health, and in some cases, it might add to the stress and burden experienced by owners. Future research should continue to examine the role of pet ownership in mental health, considering both individual and contextual factors.
